I mistakenly thought that life would slow down post-gallery opening. Hopefully things will slow down so I don't have to do long weekly roundups.
Monday I went to see
Walt & El Grupo with some pubd friends.
I took the metro out to Hollywood to meet my friend Kaitlin, who was ferrying me to the theater. I first stopped at
Famima, which to my great delight I found to be a Japanese
convenie (convenience store) transplanted to America. The store had all sorts of
onigiri, pocky and other assorted Japanese goodies. I chatted with the store clerk, he told me it is Familymart in Japan, makes more sense. I was beaming as I snacked down on triangle onigiri with salmon and tuna fillings, finished off with a redbean paste bun.
On to Westwood with Kaitlin to catch the movie with friends. Walt & El Grupo was a very interesting piece on Walt Disney and his animators being sent south to Brazil, Argentina and Chile to serve as goodwill cultural ambassadors, gain the opportunity to collect material for South American-inspired characters and help check Nazi influence in the southern cone. The documentary was good, and brought back a lot of nostalgia for my days down south. It was especially interesting because I had just studied about the Disney endeavor and the actions of the
OCIAA. My friend Naomi had arranged for the director Ted Thompson to be at the showing, so we got to chat with him afterwards about Disney's trip and his own project.
Tuesday I had my Pub LatAm class, which was fascinating as always. We looked at the coming of the Cold War in Latin America, and the difference of interests in Latin America and the US. In the US, interests can be seen as security, prosperity and idea promotion, usually in that order; in Latin America, it is more along economic development. In the post-WWII world, there had been a flowering of democracy in Latin America, and a focus on the economy by reformist, democratic regimes. Meanwhile, there was a real dichotomy between LatAm regimes, between dictatorial regimes that were obsequious towards the north for survival support, and the democratic regimes concerned with economic development. Where the US saw the threat of communism taking over via democratic means, many of the democratic regimes saw only minor threats of minor parties to be dealt with in the electoral process- therein lies the basis for major misunderstandings. It didn't help that the foreign policy luminary George Kennan visited Latin America and returned with an extremely paternalistic policy memo that was starkly opposed to the nuance he showed in the USSR.
Another major misunderstanding came from the sale of raw materials to the US by Latin American countries during WWII to the US at below market value. This was done because many of the countries genuinely saw the fascist threat and assisted in the war effort- there was also a promise of recoup and aid after the war. That never exactly worked out. Truman essentially told Latin American leaders, that yes, the promise existed but he couldn't act on it at the moment given all the aid going to Europe under the Marshall Plan, and the remainder going to Asia as part of the containment policy. Truman asked for patience and said it would come later; when Eisenhower came to office, he nixed the aid and said the promises would be recouped via trade.
Meanwhile, we discussed the Bolivian, Guatemalan and Cuban revolutions, the role of diplomacy and public diplomacy carried out all three. In Bolivia, the
MNR carried out some serious diplomacy to placate the US that it wasn't communist- but the bulwark against communism, that property would be respected or compensated, that the regime was not a threat. Geography, some visit diplomacy by Eisenhower's brother and lack of overall US interests in Bolivia saved the day for the MNR and the US didn't oppose.
Things were a lil different in Guatemala, where
the United Fruit Company ran the banana republic. Guatemala's geography worked against it in this case, being only 1000 miles from New Orleans and on Mexico's southern border (domino theory! if Guatemala goes, there could go Mexico). Meanwhle, the huckster
Eddie Bernays ran an incredible pr campaign for the fruit magnate. All led to the CIA carrying out its
famous 1954 coup against the Arbenz regime. So came the death of the
Good Neighbor policy. Past became prologue as the next revolution popped up in Cuba- as a few sides learned from Guatemala. First, Castro did some really adept public diplomacy via
Herbert Mathews to sell himself as a Washington-esque revolutionary figure and was not a communist, which he professed over and over. Second, the anger at US actions in Guatemala made it far more hesitant to do anything in Cuba, and was also taking Castro at face value. There was also some serious underestimation of the situation in Cuba, based on the belief that it didn't matter who ran Cuba because it would always be in our orbit. All fascinating and always my summaries don't do justice to the discussion.
Wednesday I met with Prof Pat James to discuss my trip to Japan, which his office- the
Center for International Studies supported. As a thanks, I brought him a fabulous bottle of sake I got in Obuse. The sake was smoother than mother's milk, I tried it at the factory. Then I hopped the metrolink train and was off to the desert in Corona for Kenya's installation as her Kiwanis club president. The event was lovely, but a little hard at the time because it reminded me so much of my rotary days and my friend Jerry. Kenya gave a great speech and will do great work as the club pres. I caught a ride back with her gentleman caller Vim in his audi convertible, which made for a nice ride back to Lalaland.
Thursday was a tough day, as my thoughts were with my friend Jerry- whose funeral was that day. Since I couldn't go to the funeral in Houston, I went to synagogue and said the Mourners Kaddish. There was an interesting discussion about the EU and public diplomacy As luck would have it, who came to address our Pub D Africa class but the South African Consul General and Deputy Consul. I shocked them fully by greeting them in besotho. The discussion was a reminder of the complexities of Southern Africa, and a bit of a reminder of the emnity between the ANC and Israel to this day. The new
South Africa and Israel don't always get along so well because the ANC was close with the PLO and Israel supported the apartheid government.
Friday I had an Indian lunch at the 23rd st cafe with my friend Mark Preston - a first year and the new sheriff of pub d. On to my theories of diplomacy class with Prof. Wiseman. Our topic this week was IR realism and diplomacy. It was my turn to review the work of the esteemed IR academic theorist
Prof. Hans J. Morgenthau's Politics Among Nations. His work was a stunning take on power and diplomacy. He very systematically lays out the functions, instruments of diplomacy and its role in preserving peace. It was pretty heady stuff, and almost a little of surprising tone from one of the fathers of
Realism (to be sure, a classical realist) who clearly took a wide view on the role of diplomacy in international affairs- my critique being of most realists that they focus on power alone and miss the other important factors. Morgenthau is easily the most realistic realist I have come across. We had discussed Machiavelli and his writings on diplomacy and impact on realist thought. I started off my review stating that Machiavelli's work is fine for petulant princes squabbling over petty intrigues, but if you want to be a statesman, Morgenthau's piece is a requirement. I went on to re-brand his work from "Politics Among Nations," to a far catchier "The Statesman." Sorry Hans, but if you want the work to be held for the bible of diplomacy that it is, you have to get a better title.
Overall we had a fantastic class and came up with some interesting metrics to explain international relations. Here goes the fuzzy math: Domestic Policy + Foreign Policy + Diplomacy = Statecraft; DoPo + FoPo + Diplo + Public Diplomacy = 21st Century Statecraft. But keep in mind that PD is really a force multiplier so it could also read PD Squared. Meanwhile, Intention + Capability = Threat; yet the balance must be calibrated because intention is not of the same value as capability and far too many conflate the two and give equal weight to unequal factors. This is possibly the first math equations i have understood in years.
We escaped from our Lab of Diplomacy and took to
The Lab for a drink after class. Then I was off to return to the Cromwell Premier League (CPL) cricket match, where my team- the
Mumbai Indians squared off against the
Bangalore Royal Challengers. Our opponents laughed when I chided them for not using the proper name of "Bangaluru." 'Twas nice to be back on the pitch. I batted terribly in practice, but turned some heads with a few diving catches. I will be good at this game with just a little more practice. A teammate named Swami worked on teaching me how to
spin bowl- both leg spin and off spin. Next up is the googlie. Anyway, unfortunately we lost. I didn't do much, the ball never came to me and I didn't get to take my licks at bat. Still fun, and always a joy to watch and hang out.